Mexican Southern Boarder vs United States Southern Boarder

Comments Mexico's Immigration Law: Let's Try It Here at Home

by J. Michael Waller



05/08/2006





"Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.That's too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.







At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve"




It is time to get as tough on our southern board as Mexico is on theirs.If you are living in South America your hardest board to cross to get into the US is the Mexican boarder.If you can get to the northern part of Mexico without being deported by the Mexican government your in. The US has a lot of Latin America come in illegal. The illegals are not just poor Mexican family man who can not get work in Mexico



Drug and people runners fly across the broader.Mexican official are bought and paid for by the drug cart ells.



The boarder is worst now than went McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill was on the table. The US Army cannot arrest US citizens.The army must secure the boards of our country.

Positively Perry

   Jeff is great for the 10th  District in MA. He was seeking to represent us in congress before the incumbent quit. After the Democrat who held the seat for many years resigned some R's decided the political timing was right to run. Jeff wants to serve the voters of the district as a statesman NOT as a simple politician. The latter comes are more a  politician than statesman. The politican checks the political winds before choosing to run. Let us throw our support to a statesman who has already represented  part of the district on Beacon Hill. Jeff voted against MA unviersal health care on princple in the General Court.( The General Court is the MA House of Rep.)


"A Republican crackdown blocking illegal immigrants from scooping up taxpayer-funded benefits such as welfare and food stamps is gaining steam on Beacon Hill - as Democratic lawmakers and two candidates for governor scrambled yesterday to back the tough new measure" and Jeff Perry was working for LEGAL Americans. We  should have Jeff in Washington D.C.not giving citizenship befits to illegals in this country.

We can have a constitutional republic.

SENATOR SCOTT BROWN ENDORSES JEFF PERRY

FOR CONGRESS IN THE 10TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT RACE





"In his first major Massachusetts endorsement since he was elected to the United States Senate, Senator Scott Brown announced today that he is supporting State Representative Jeff Perry in the 10th Congressional District race



“Scott Brown stands for something very special and very rare in politics today, bringing government back to the people. And today I am very proud to have him standing for me,” Jeff Perry said.



“Scott Brown won the hearts, minds and the votes of good people all over the 10th District when he pledged to listen to them on the crucial challenges facing our nation. Scott knows that they want the federal government to stop spending money they don’t have, to rebuild the economy and create jobs and to protect our nation in these very dangerous times. And so do I.” Senator Brown won 60% of the vote in the 10th District during the Special Senate Election on January 19th."

It is time to move Jeff Perry from Beacon Hill in Boston to the Capital in Washington.

Half Baker Idea

The title is a play on words.The original phase is a half baked idea. Charlie is a Republican in Name Only.No conservative who invest ages Charlie's views will vote for him. He was Mitt Romney's right man developing Romeycare for Mass. The information at Baker's website about health care points to more taxes to pay hospitals for Medicaid short falls." The state must live up to its end of the bargain and reform its Medicaid program so hospitals and small businesses are not subsidizing health for low income Medicaid subscribers." Raising taxes and or fees is the only way to the hospitals for money lost to Romneycare.
  The only way Massachusetts has not gone in bankruptcy is because stimulus funds have paid the Medicaid  short fall. When the stimulus money has dried up MA will like CA. If you want IOU's from the state instead of checks vote Baker for Governor.
   "Massachusetts is losing jobs to competing states because of unpredictable and changing tax laws, unfair health care costs that penalize small businesses, high-energy costs, and unreasonable rules, regulations, and permitting laws enacted by state bureaucrats who’ve never met a payroll." from Charlie's website. The Obamacare test case in the state should be bring companies to MA. Is the healthcare that Mr.Baker work on for Governor Romney good for job creation or bad.